droganbloggin - meanderings and musings
Site Feed
blogroll
Note on Posting a Comment: If your comment warrants a response and you wish it sent privately, please provide an e-mail address. Otherwise I will comment on your comment and it will be public.Entries from May 1, 2015 - May 31, 2015
Where does talent go?
From Wladawsky-Berger, I. (2015, May 12). Imagination as a Journey of Survival and Discovery.
The study concluded that while digital, virtual interactions are important, they are not sufficient. “As computing, digital storage, and bandwidth performance improve exponentially, virtual [knowledge] flows are likely to grow more rapidly… However, physical flows will not be fully replaced by virtual flows. As people become more and more connected virtually, the importance of tacit knowledge exchange through physical, face-to-face interactions will only increase, leading to more physical flow… Talent migrates to the most vibrant geographies and institutions because that is where it can improve its performance more rapidly by learning faster [emphasis added]… Increasing migration suggests virtual connection is not enough - people increasingly seek rich and serendipitous face-to-face encounters as well.”
Renewables Are Disruptive to Coal and Gas
This is from a blog post by Tyler Cowen.
This article suggests significant changes in the structure of geopolitical power due to disruption in state economies. There would also seem to be the possibility of major disruption in the global distribution of bulk commodities.
The test of time for a society, institution, and individual is...
...their capacity for change to remain relevant.
I think to myself, That’s the problem, all right, where to start.
From page 63 of Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance: An Inquiry into Values. This starts an extended section the compares and contrasts the classic and romantic views of the world. I commend this section to your attention. |
A New Way of Thinking
I was reading Toolkits of the Mind in the May/June 2015 issue of the MIT Technology Review and I came across the following:
Software developers as a species tend to be convinced that programming languages have a grip on the mind strong enough to change the way you approach problems—even to change which problems you think to solve.
I struck out the last part of this extract because I'm a bit uncomfortable with the notion that the language dictates what we think about it. On the other hand, it may well be that the language we use -- differential equations, economics, visualization, diplomacy as examples -- may well be a constraint that that keeps us from understanding and potentially resolving some of the intractable issues of the day -- the Middle East, income and capability inequality, race relations.
If all one knows is arithmetic then all one can resolve is issues that can be described in arithmetic.
I think of some of the issues I face, most often the need to modify human behavior (sometimes my own), and think that maybe I'm using the wrong language.
Most successful programming languages have an overall philosophy or set of guiding principles that organize their vocabulary and grammar—the set of possible instructions they make available to the programmer—into a logical whole.